Thursday, April 26, 2007

3654 - 3660 Cook

In 1895 the four 3 story townhomes pictured above were built a few lots east of Scruggs Memorial Methodist Episcopal Church, which was built in the previous decade at the corner of Cook & Spring. The highway like Spring Avenue we know today existed only as a series of two lane side streets. Grouped in two pairs to give the appearance of two large mansions, the townhomes were connected in the center to form one building. Each pair though was one property.

3654-56, boarded at left was most recently owned by LRA and had obviously been abandoned for many years, while 3658-60 was in private ownership was in relatively good shape when I first discovered these gems about 7 years ago.

The floor plan of each was essentially the same in each unit, with variations in fenestration and certain details such as the entrances.
The entrance of 3654 stood out a bit more lavish than the others with its columned recessed entry complete with marble wainscot and wood panels above.
Here the connection between the two pairs is visible. The fact that the 3rd story did not have a masonry party wall as the floors below did would later prove as a fatal design flaw for the group.
A beautiful detail above the entrance to 3660.
Inside, although not overly large, the townhomes were well appointed with wood paneling, arched entry's with fretwork, and heavy crown moldings in all the public rooms (living room of 3660 above). Beyond the front living room and entry hall, each townhome had a grand three story stair hall with a large (at least 6'x8') skylight which poured natural light down through the home and into the interior rooms.
A photo montage of the stair hall in 3656
The skylight above

As I mentioned it was obvious that the east pair had been abandoned for many years, and unfortunately, skylights can let water pour inside as well. When I first entered 3654, the skylight was already long gone and most of what had been the stairs and landings were in a pile in the basement... so was everything in the two story rear wing which would have contained the kitchen, rear stair and rear bedrooms. 3656 was in slightly better shape, although many areas of floor were obviously near collapse, such as that above the large central dining room.

Even with these conditions on the interior, I was convinced that the exceptional exterior warranted re-building the inside of the east pair. The west pair although un-occupied appeared from peeking in the windows to be in exceptional shape, with no water damage visible inside.
In the early morning of August 29 of last year fire struck the building. Its unclear where it started, but the result was that the remaining rear portions of 3654-56 were gutted throughout and the 3rd floor and the roofs of 3658-60 were completely destroyed. Photo at left from KSDK Channel 5's website.




The front of the townhomes after the fire
Damage in the stair hall of 3656
Everything beyond the stair hall of 3656 was completely gutted
Not long after the fire, the City commenced demolition of the east pair of townhomes, and on August 30, 2006 the west pair were condemned for demolition, which would be left up to the owners.
The turret of 3654 stood like a giant tomb stone as the
last remaining portion of the east half of the building


The remaining pairs last stand, marked for
destruction recently by the wreckers sign

Inside the front room of 3658. Although this potion of the exterior is
flat, the interior of the window wall was given a graceful curve
The fireplace on the first floor of the stair hall in 3658. Below looking up at the 3rd floor stair balcony and the open sky above. The Skylight frame had crash landed at the 2nd floor level over the opening to the first floor below. Further account of the impending demolition can be found on the Ecology of Absence Blog.

3 comments:

Urban Review said...

Paul, these images are just painful to view. What wonderful buildings going away long before their time. What a shame....

Anonymous said...

This is like a sock in the gut. Completely heartbreaking.

Thank you for posting them.

Doug Duckworth said...

I wonder if the outcome would be different if the LRA didn't have possession?